Two ways to get started
Book a consult
For educators, faculty, programs, and administrators evaluating Instant Review for a group.
For educators, faculty, programs, and administrators evaluating Instant Review for a group.
"*" indicates required fields
Join the waitlist
For individual learners and fellows who want early access when it opens.
For individual learners and fellows who want early access when it opens.
"*" indicates required fields
What to expect after you reach out
Choosing between the two paths is simple — it comes down to whether you are exploring this for a group or for yourself.
- Book a consult if you are evaluating Instant Review for a residency, department, fellowship, or health system.
- Join the waitlist if you are an individual clinician who wants to sharpen your own scanning.
A consult is built for the questions teams ask:
- How it maps to your workflow and standards
- What a pilot looks like, and how long it takes
- How data and governance are handled
- How it connects to credentialing and privileging
Either way, you reach the GUSI team directly — no sales gauntlet, no obligation.
After a consult request, the GUSI team follows up to understand your program and design a path that fits. Expect us to ask about:
- Your program size and specialties
- How scans are reviewed today
- The standards and guidelines you work to
Because Instant Review runs through ScanHub and works with your existing devices, getting started is a matter of enabling feedback rather than replacing systems — so early conversations focus on fit and rollout, not a heavy technical lift.
After a waitlist signup, you will be among the first contacted when access opens — and you will hear from us occasionally rather than constantly. Early participants receive:
- Priority access before public launch
- A trial period on your own scans
- Direct onboarding support from the GUSI team
- A say in the roadmap before full launch
If your interest later grows into a team decision, a consult is always the next step, and the two paths connect cleanly.
Prefer to talk to a person first? A consult request is the fastest way to reach the team directly; note in the message that you would like a conversation before anything else, and that is where we will start. Whichever path you choose, the intent is the same: to make it easy to see whether Instant Review is right for you, with no pressure and a clear picture of what comes next.
Not sure which to choose?
When in doubt, book a consult — it is the more flexible of the two paths, and nothing about it commits you to anything.
- It fits an individual wanting a conversation just as easily as a department evaluating a system-wide rollout
- It exists to answer questions — scope, safety, data, pilots, pricing, timing
- You talk to a real member of the GUSI team, at whatever level of detail you need
If the waitlist turns out to be the better fit, we will simply point you there.
However you reach out, expect a prompt, human response and a clear picture of the next step. Instant Review is in pre-launch, and the people who engage now genuinely shape what launches — so the best time to start the conversation is while the roadmap is still open.
A few practical notes before you send
For the consult form, the details that help most are your role, your organization, and a sentence about what you are trying to solve — whether that is faculty review burden, program standardization, accreditation evidence, or a system-wide quality initiative. Those few fields let the GUSI team come to the first conversation already oriented to your situation, so the call is about fit and rollout rather than starting from scratch. Program size helps us gauge the right pilot shape; the message field is the place to flag anything specific, including if you simply want to talk before committing to anything.
For the waitlist, name, email, and specialty are enough to get you in line and to tailor what we send. There is no obligation and no barrage of email — just first notice when access opens for your institution and the occasional update as launch approaches. If your interest later turns into a team decision, the consult path is always one click away, and the two connect cleanly.
A note on this prototype: the forms above validate in the browser and show a confirmation, but they are not yet wired to a server. Before this goes live, connect them to an endpoint — a form service, a small serverless function, or your CRM — so submissions actually reach the team. Everything else on the page is production-shaped and ready to be pointed at real infrastructure. Whichever path fits you, the aim is the same: a low-pressure, clearly-explained way to find out whether Instant Review is right for your learners, your program, or your system, with a concrete sense of what happens next.
Not ready to commit?
Stay in the loop
Frequently Asked Questions
Should I book a consult or join the Instant Review™ waitlist?
Book a consult if you are evaluating Instant Review™ for a residency, fellowship, department, program, or health system. Join the waitlist if you are an individual learner or clinician interested in early access for your own scanning. If you are unsure, booking a consult is the more flexible option and gives you a chance to talk directly with the GUSI team.
What happens after I request a consult?
A member of the GUSI team will follow up to learn more about your program, current scan-review workflow, priorities, and the standards you work with. From there, we can discuss how Instant Review™ could fit your existing workflow, what a pilot could look like, and any questions around implementation, governance, or rollout.
Does requesting a consult or joining the waitlist commit me to anything?
No. Requesting a consult is an opportunity to explore whether Instant Review™ is a good fit for your needs, and joining the waitlist simply gives you early notice when access becomes available. Neither option creates an obligation to purchase or participate.
Want more before you decide?
See the full list of questions, or the proof behind Instant Review.