How it works

Coaching every scan, not just a sample

Most programs can only give feedback on a fraction of the scans their learners perform. Instant Review coaches every one of them — with the same standards, in minutes, however many scans your team produces.

Coaching at a glance

Every scan receives coaching feedback — not a sampled few

The same standards apply to every learner, every time

Feedback arrives in minutes, at any hour

Coverage does not depend on anyone’s availability

Why sampling falls short

When feedback depends on scheduling, most scans go uncoached. Programs review what they can, hope it is representative, and accept that the rest goes unexamined. The unreviewed remainder is exactly where habits quietly set — good and bad — with nothing to correct them.

Instant Review changes the arithmetic. Because coaching feedback is automatic, reviewing every scan costs no more than reviewing a handful. The question stops being “which scans can we afford to look at?” and becomes “what should each learner work on next?” — a far more useful question, and one you can only ask when nothing is being skipped.

What complete coverage changes

Full coverage is not simply a more thorough version of sampling — it changes what a program can see. Patterns that hide in the unreviewed remainder become visible: a learner reinforcing a habit, a scan type where a whole cohort struggles, a site drifting from the standard.

That visibility is the raw material for improvement. You cannot coach what you never looked at, and partial review, by design, never looks at most of it.

What every scan gets

Specific, actionable coaching feedback

The same consistent standards

Turnaround measured in minutes

A record that builds into a trajectory

Consistency is the point

Coaching only compounds if it is consistent. When guidance shifts depending on who is available or how busy the week has been, learners receive mixed signals and cannot tell real progress from noise.

Because Instant Review applies the same standards to every scan, feedback means the same thing in week one and week thirty. That steadiness is what turns individual comments into a learning curve — and what lets a program compare cohorts fairly instead of relying on impressions.

How coaching stays calibrated

Consistency has to be maintained, not assumed. Instant Review is designed to be checked against reference exams and monitored over time, so the standard it applies this quarter is the standard it applied last quarter. Programs can review how the system is performing and confirm it still reflects the guidance they want their learners to receive.

The result is coaching that is complete, consistent, and steady — three things that are difficult to achieve together when feedback depends on finding time in a calendar.

Note: Instant Review focuses on coaching. Formal competency grading is part of a broader GUSI solution, and Instant Review is one component of it — talk to us about where it fits your program.

What this looks like week to week

In practice, the shift is less about technology than about rhythm. A learner finishes a scan, uploads it, and has specific guidance before they see their next patient. They try the correction, upload again, and find out whether it worked. Repeat that a few dozen times over a rotation and the improvement is not a matter of opinion — it is visible in the feedback itself.

For the program, the change is that this happens for everyone, not just the learners who happened to be scanning when someone experienced was free. New residents starting a rotation get the same standards as the fellow finishing one. A learner at a satellite site gets the same coaching as a learner down the hall. Coverage stops depending on geography, seniority, or luck.

None of this requires a program to change how it works. Learners upload the way they already do through ScanHub, and the coaching simply arrives — no new hardware, no migration, and no additional step for the person holding the probe. What changes is that nothing goes uncoached, and that the guidance is the same quality on a quiet Tuesday as it is during a busy rotation.

It also removes a quiet source of frustration. Learners often know a scan was imperfect but cannot articulate why, and without timely guidance they either repeat the error or overcorrect into a new one. Immediate, specific coaching closes that gap while the memory of the acquisition is intact, which is precisely when a correction is cheapest to make and most likely to stick.

Didn’t find your answer?

No worries! If you have any other questions or need more information, feel free to reach out directly.

Have more questions? Send us a message.

Contact Sales

Frequently Asked Questions

Yes — every scan submitted through ScanHub receives coaching feedback, not a sampled subset.

Typically under five minutes, at any hour, so the guidance lands while the scan is still fresh.

Yes — the same standards apply to every scan, which is what makes progress comparable over time.

FAQ's
Join 18,000+ Learners

Get early access

Book a consult for your team, or join the waitlist as an individual — both reach the GUSI team directly.

Book a consult

For educators, faculty, programs, and administrators evaluating Instant Review for a group.

For educators, faculty, programs, and administrators evaluating Instant Review for a group.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

Join the waitlist

For individual learners and fellows who want early access when it opens.

For individual learners and fellows who want early access when it opens.

"*" indicates required fields

Name*

“”