The integration of a POCUS curriculum in undergraduate medical education is a topic of significant interest and discussion. This blog delves into the insights shared during a recent webinar on the subject, featuring Global Ultrasound Institute founders, Dr. Kevin Bergman and Dr. Mena Ramos, alongside an esteemed group of POCUS experts and educators from various medical schools from across the United States.
The Evolution of POCUS in Medical Education
POCUS, or Point-of-Care Ultrasound, has been a part of medical education since the early 2000s. Initially, it was focused on specific applications to reinforce clinical skills and anatomical understanding. The University of South Carolina pioneered a comprehensive four-year integrated ultrasound curriculum in 2006. Survey results showed that over 90% of students felt it enhanced their grasp of basic sciences. Despite progress, a 2022 survey revealed that only 57% of U.S. medical schools have a formal ultrasound curriculum, with a mere 10% offering a fully integrated four-year program.
Challenges in Integrating POCUS
Implementing a POCUS curriculum involves navigating several challenges which can be categorized into three main groups: medical students, faculty, and administration.
Medical Student Engagement
One of the primary challenges is engaging students who might not immediately see the relevance of POCUS to their chosen specialty. Students often prioritize exam-related content, and without formal assessment, POCUS sessions may be overlooked.
Faculty Training and Support
The “donut effect” describes the gap between students’ exposure to POCUS and faculty’s proficiency in using and teaching it. Many faculty members lack training, which can hinder effective implementation and student learning.
Administrative and Resource Limitations
Administrative support is crucial for providing resources such as equipment and faculty time. However, securing this support can be difficult, especially if leadership is unfamiliar with POCUS and its benefits.
Strategies for Successful Implementation
Despite these challenges, several strategies have proven effective in integrating POCUS into medical education.
Medical Students
Engaging Students and Encouraging Ownership
Student-driven initiatives, such as forming ultrasound interest groups, med student POCUS ambassador groups, can increase engagement. Encouraging students to advocate for POCUS in their curriculum can also sway administrative decisions, as student feedback is often a key factor in curriculum development.
From Pain Points to POCUS Solutions
POCUS can be used to address pain points in the existing medical school curriculum. Instead of contributing an additional learning topic to an already saturated curriculum, POCUS can be framed as a way to address challenging learning topics such as the rotator cuff anatomy.
Introducing POCUS in the Basic Sciences Years
POCUS can be introduced in anatomy to build interest early in medical education. Furthermore, anatomists can serve as excellent faculty allies to support POCUS education.
Faculty
Building Faculty Expertise
Training faculty across specialties is essential. Institutions can start by identifying and supporting POCUS champions who can lead and train others. Collaboration with departments that already use POCUS can also help build a comprehensive training program.
Incorporating POCUS into Existing Curricula
Instead of adding separate POCUS courses, integrating it into existing modules can reinforce learning. For instance, using POCUS to teach complex anatomical concepts can enhance understanding and retention.
Administration
Securing Administrative Support
Demonstrating the clinical and educational benefits of POCUS can help secure administrative support. Highlighting its potential to improve patient outcomes and reduce costs can be persuasive arguments for investment in POCUS resources. Furthermore, positive feedback from medical students exposed to POCUS education helps to recruit administrative support.
The Role of Medical Students
Medical students play a pivotal role in the adoption and success of POCUS curricula. Their enthusiasm and demand can drive institutional changes, making them key stakeholders in this educational shift. Encouraging student involvement in teaching and research can further cement POCUS as an integral part of medical education.
Conclusion
Implementing a POCUS curriculum in undergraduate medical education is a complex but rewarding endeavor. By addressing challenges related to student engagement, faculty training, and administrative support, medical schools can successfully integrate this powerful tool into their programs. The insights shared by experts highlight the importance of collaboration, strategic planning, and leveraging existing resources to build a sustainable POCUS curriculum that enhances medical education and prepares students for the future of healthcare.
Webinar Participants
Dr. Russ Horowitz, MD,RDMS
Director, Emergency and Critical Care Ultrasound
Lurie Children’s Hospital
Director of Ultrasound Education,
Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern university
Dr. Beryl Greywoode
Associate Clinical Professor of Pediatrics
Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania
General Pediatrics Point of Care Ultrasound Director
Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP)
Dr. Nicholas LeFevre
Family Physician and Faculty
University of Missouri-Columbia School of Medicine
Co-Authored AAFP POCUS Residency Curriculum Guidelines
Dr. Sally Graglia (she/her)
Associate Clinical Professor of Emergency Medicine
Director of Medical Student Ultrasound Education
University of California San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine
Dr. Rob Ferre
Emergency Physician and POCUS Division Chief
Dept of Emergency Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine (IUSM)
POCUS Curriculum Program Director IUSM
Webinar Hosts
Dr. Mena Ramos
Family Physician
Co-Founder, Co-CEO
Global Ultrasound Institute
Co-Authored AAFP POCUS Residency Curriculum Guidelines
Dr. Kevin Bergman
Family Physician
Co-Founder, Co-CEO
Global Ultrasound Institute
Co-Authored AAFP POCUS Residency Curriculum Guidelines
References
Russell FM, Zakeri B, Herbert A, Ferre RM, Leiser A, Wallach PM. The State of Point-of-Care Ultrasound Training in Undergraduate Medical Education: Findings From a National Survey. Acad Med. 2022 May 1;97(5):723-727. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000004512. Epub 2022 Apr 27. PMID: 34789665.
Lane N, Lahham S, Joseph L, Bahner DP, Fox JC. Ultrasound in medical education: listening to the echoes of the past to shape a vision for the future. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2015 Oct;41(5):461-7. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0535-7. Epub 2015 May 5. PMID: 26038053.
Dietrich CF, Hoffmann B, Abramowicz J, Badea R, Braden B, Cantisani V, Chammas MC, Cui XW, Dong Y, Gilja OH, Hari R, Nisenbaum H, Nicholls D, Nolsøe CP, Nürnberg D, Prosch H, Radzina M, Recker F, Sachs A, Saftoiu A, Serra A, Sweet L, Vinayak S, Westerway S, Chou YH, Blaivas M. Medical Student Ultrasound Education: A WFUMB Position Paper, Part I. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2019 Feb;45(2):271-281. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.09.017. Epub 2018 Nov 27. PMID: 30497768.
Hoppmann RA, Rao VV, Poston MB, Howe DB, Hunt PS, Fowler SD, Paulman LE, Wells JR, Richeson NA, Catalana PV, Thomas LK, Britt Wilson L, Cook T, Riffle S, Neuffer FH, McCallum JB, Keisler BD, Brown RS, Gregg AR, Sims KM, Powell CK, Garber MD, Morrison JE, Owens WB, Carnevale KA, Jennings WR, Fletcher S. An integrated ultrasound curriculum (iUSC) for medical students: 4-year experience. Crit Ultrasound J. 2011 Apr;3(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s13089-011-0052-9. Epub 2011 Feb 1. PMID: 21516137; PMCID: PMC3064888.